Stalking Beasts, but Swatting Flies: The Teaching of Critical Thinking

Authors

  • John E. McPeck University of Western Ontario

Keywords:

Critical thinking, Argument analysis, Transfer of learning

Abstract

This article takes a critical look at what is called “critical thinking,” and it shows how this notion is typically confused with such notions as “reasoning ability” and “argument analysis.” Moreover, it is argued that the confusion of these notions often forms a large part of the justification for programs in critical thinking. The role of critical thinking in “everyday problems” is also discussed, and the author presents an hypothesis that knowledge and training in the traditional disciplines has more potential transfer than direct training in “critical thinking skills.”

References

Ennis, R. H. A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 1962

Johnson, R. H. and Blair, J. Logical self-defense. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerso

Kahane, H. Logic and contemporary rhetoric: The use of reason in everyday life (2nd e Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1976.

McPeck, J. E. Critical thinking and education. Oxford: Martin Robertson Publis

Scriven, M. Applied logic: An introduction to scientific reasoning. Palo Alto. Calif Research Laboratories, 1966.

Scriven, M. Education for survival. In D. E. Purpel & M. Berlanger (Eds.) Curric cultural revolution. Berkeley, California: McCutchan, 1972.

Scriven, M. Reasoning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1976.

Downloads

Published

1984-01-01

How to Cite

McPeck , J. E. (1984). Stalking Beasts, but Swatting Flies: The Teaching of Critical Thinking. Canadian Journal of Education Revue Canadienne De l’éducation, 9(1), 28–44. Retrieved from https://cje.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/8178

Issue

Section

Articles