Stalking Beasts, but Swatting Flies: The Teaching of Critical Thinking
Keywords:
Critical thinking, Argument analysis, Transfer of learningAbstract
This article takes a critical look at what is called “critical thinking,” and it shows how this notion is typically confused with such notions as “reasoning ability” and “argument analysis.” Moreover, it is argued that the confusion of these notions often forms a large part of the justification for programs in critical thinking. The role of critical thinking in “everyday problems” is also discussed, and the author presents an hypothesis that knowledge and training in the traditional disciplines has more potential transfer than direct training in “critical thinking skills.”
References
Ennis, R. H. A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 1962
Johnson, R. H. and Blair, J. Logical self-defense. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerso
Kahane, H. Logic and contemporary rhetoric: The use of reason in everyday life (2nd e Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1976.
McPeck, J. E. Critical thinking and education. Oxford: Martin Robertson Publis
Scriven, M. Applied logic: An introduction to scientific reasoning. Palo Alto. Calif Research Laboratories, 1966.
Scriven, M. Education for survival. In D. E. Purpel & M. Berlanger (Eds.) Curric cultural revolution. Berkeley, California: McCutchan, 1972.
Scriven, M. Reasoning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1976.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Education follows Creative Commons Licencing CC BY-NC-ND.