Book Review: The Myths of Measurement and Meritocracy: Why Accountability Metrics in Higher Education Are Unfair and Increase Inequity

Auteurs-es

  • Jonathan G. Bayley University of Windsor

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.5917

Mots-clés :

Book review

Statistiques

Chargement des statistiques…

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Jonathan G. Bayley, University of Windsor

Dr. Bayley has presented at international conferences and published numerous scholarly articles in various research design formats including historical, self-report survey research, case study, and reflective pedagogical practices (Alberta History, Canadian Winds, Canadian Music Educator, Journal of Historical Research in Music Education, Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, Journal of Comparative and International Education, Journal of Peer Learning, Journal of Teaching and Learning, National Association of College Wind and Percussion Instructors (NACWPI) Journal, and the International Journal of Music Education).

Références

Kellerman, B. (2012). The End of Leadership. New York: Harper Business.

Gopnik, A. (2016). The Gardner and the Carpenter: What the New Science of Child Development Tells Us about the Relationship Between Parents and Children. New York: Picador.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

02-01-2023

Comment citer

Bayley, J. G. . (2023). Book Review: The Myths of Measurement and Meritocracy: Why Accountability Metrics in Higher Education Are Unfair and Increase Inequity. Revue Canadienne De l’éducation, 45(4), xvii-xx. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.5917

Numéro

Rubrique

Comptes rendus / Book Reviews