Teacher Perceptions of an Innovation and Degree of Implementation
Mots-clés :
Educational innovation, Curriculum implementation, Teacher perceptionsRésumé
Nous examinons dans cet article le rapport entre la perception que les enseignants ont d'un programme d'enseignement innovateur et la mesure dans laquelle ils le mettent en application. Nous avions posé l'hypothèse que la perception des enseignants concernant la compatibilité, l'observabilité, et la mise à l'essai de l'innovation serait en corrélation positive avec le degré de mise en application, alors que la perception de sa complexité, elle, serait en corrélation négative. Nous avions également formulé l'hypothèse que les cinq variables réunies rendraient compte d'une proportion importante de la variance dans le degré de mise en application. Nos conclusions confirment notre première hypothèse, mais soulignent la nécessité de prendre un plus grand nombre d'éléments en considération dans le processus de changement.
Références
Anderson, R. N., & Robert, B. A. Reflections concerning the Canada Studies Foundation: An internal evaluation of eight years of activity. Toronto: Canada Studies Foundation, 1979.
Ashley, J. P., & Butts, D. P. A study of the impact of an inservice education program on teaching behavior. Research and Curriculum Development in Science Education. University of Texas Publication, No. 7203 (Monograph), 1970.
Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. Implementation of educational innovation. The Educational Forum, 1976, 40, 345-370.
Berman, P., & Pauly, E. Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. II: Factors affecting change agent projects. Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation, 1975.
Boyd, W. L. The politics of curriculum change and stability. Educational Researcher, 1979, 8(2), 12-18.
Caffarella, E. P., Caffarella, R. S., Hart, J. E., Pooler, A. E., & Salesi, R. A. A methodology for predicting the diffusability of educational innovations. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology, New Orleans, 1979.
Charters, W. W., & Jones, J. E. On the risk of appraising non-events in program evaluation. Educational Researcher, 1979, 2(11), 5-7.
Collingwood, V. Planning of innovation in higher education. Program Learning and Educational Technology, 1979, 16(1), 8-15.
Crowther, F. Factors affecting the rate of adoption of the 1971 Alberta social studies curriculum for elementary schools. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Alberta, 1972.
Deal, T. E., Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. Organizational influences on educational innovations. In J. F. Baldridge, T. E. Deal, & M. Z. Ancell (Eds.), Managing change in educational organizations. Berkeley: McCutchan, 1975.
Fliegel, F. C. A cross-national comparison of farmers' perceptions of innovation as related to adoption behavior. Rural Sociology, 1968, 33, 437-449.
Fullan, M. Implementation: Its nature and determinants. Paper presented at the meeting of IMTEC (International Management Training for Educational Change), Oslo, Norway, May 1975.
Fullan, M. Conceptualizing problems of curriculum implementation. Paper presented at the Symposium on Curriculum Inquiry, Victoria, British Columbia, February 1979.
Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 1977, 47(1), 335-397.
Goodlad, J. I., & Klein, M. F. Behind the classroom door. Columbus, Ohio: Charles Jones, 1970.
Goodridge, C. G. Factors that influence the decision to adopt an educational innovation: IGE (Tech. Rep. 376). Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Research & Development Center, December 1976.
Greenwood, P. W., Mann, D., & McLaughlin, M. W. Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. III: The process of change. Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation, 1975.
Hall, G. E., & Loucks, S. F. A development model for determining whether a treatment is actually implemented. American Educational Research Journal, 1977, 14(3), 263-276.
Hall, G. E., Zigarmi, P. K., & Hord, S. M. A taxonomy of interventions: The prototype and initial testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1979.
Havelock, R. G., et al. Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Research, Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, 1969.
Hook, C. M., & Rosenshine, B. V. Accuracy of teachers reports of their classroom behavior. Review of Educational Research, 1979, 49(1), 1-12.
Kerlinger, F. N. Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
Kester, R. J., & Howard, J. Evaluating the process of educational change: A model and its application. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C., April 1975.
Kivlin, J. E., & Fliegel, F. C. Differential perceptions of innovations and rate of adoption. Rural Sociology, 1967, 32(1), 78-91.
Leithwood, K. A., & Montgomery, D. J. Evaluating program implementation. Unpublished manuscript. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1978.
MacDonald, B., & Walker, R. Changing the curriculum. London: Open Books, 1976.
Paul, D. A. Change processes at the elementary, secondary and post-secondary levels of education. In N. Nash & J. Culbertson (Eds.), Linking processes in educational improvement. Columbus, Ohio: University Council for Educational Administration, 1977.
Rand Corporation. Federal programs supporting educational change (Vols. 1-8). Santa Monica, California: Author, 1975-1978.
Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press, 1971.
Stenhouse, L. An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heineman, 1975.
Williams, W. Implementation analysis and assessment. In P. D. Cook (Ed.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 3). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1978.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
La Revue canadienne de l’éducation utilise la licence CC BY-NC-ND de Creative Commons.
