The Functional Paradigms of Teachers

Authors

  • Robert K. Crocker Memorial University of Newfoundland

Keywords:

Teacher paradigms, Teaching research, Functional paradigms, Teacher education

Abstract

This article addresses the problem of redirecting research on teaching from an emphasis on how classrooms function to one on why they function in particular ways. The proposal is based on a reformulation of the concept of "paradigm" as it applies to the study of teaching. The basic proposition is that paradigms should be considered as characteristic of the community of practitioners as well as of the community of scholars. It is argued that an attempt to identify the features of the "functional paradigms" of teachers would help redirect our thinking towards explanatory principles rather than descriptions of classroom functioning. Illustrative research examples are given to demonstrate how the implementation of educational innovations is a possible strategic area for the investigation of functional paradigms. It is also suggested that an examination of the contrast between the precepts of teacher educators and those of teachers would be a second strategic area. Finally, the issue of how established paradigms are perpetuated through the use of models or exemplars is addressed.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Crocker, R. K. From curriculum to classroom: An interview study of teacher perceptions of curriculum change in primary science. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Education, 1979.

Doyle, W. Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. In L. S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 5). Itasca, Illinois: F. E. Peacock, 1978.

Dunkin, M. J. & Biddle, B. J. The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1974.

Elliott, J. Developing hypotheses about classrooms from teachers' practical constructs: An account of the Ford teaching project. Interchange, 1977, 7, 2-22.

Gage, N. L. Paradigms for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of Research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.

Imershein, A. W. Organizational change as paradigm shift. The Sociological Quarterly, 1977, 18, 33-43.

Joyce, B. & Weil, M. Models of teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

Oakley, W. F. & Crocker, R. K. An exploratory study of teacher interventions in elementary science laboratory groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1980, 17, 407-418.

Sharp, R. & Green, A. Education and social control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.

Snow, R. E. Theory construction for research on teaching. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.

Stallings, J. A. & Kaskowitz, D. H. Follow-through classroom observation evaluation, 1972-73. Menlo Park, Calif.: Stanford Research Institute, 1974.

Winne, P. H. & Marx R. W. Reconceptualizing research on teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977, 69, 668-678.

Downloads

Published

1983-01-01

How to Cite

Crocker , R. K. (1983). The Functional Paradigms of Teachers. Canadian Journal of Education Revue Canadienne De l’éducation, 8(4), 350–361. Retrieved from https://cje.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/8171

Issue

Section

Articles